Simon's minimax two-stage design
Webb1 nov. 2010 · Table 2 displays the minimax and optimal designs under H 0 and H 1 with and without efficacy stopping for p 0 = 0.1 and p 1 = 0.3. The minimax designs now … Webbfor the minimax and the optimal Simon’s two-stage design was written by Adrian Man-der (Mander 2009). This article introduces another command for sample-size calculation for …
Simon's minimax two-stage design
Did you know?
Webb3 apr. 2024 · Methods We propose a new single-arm two-stage optimal design with survival endpoint by using the one-sample log rank test based on exact variance estimates. This proposed design with survival... WebbOptimal Two-Stage Designs For Phase II Clinical Trials. Richard Simon, Controlled Clinical Trials 10:1-10, 1989. Enter probability of accepting poor drug (alpha) [between 0 and 0.3 …
Webbpractically synonymous with the Simon’s optimal and MINIMAX two stage (1989) –designs which have stood the test of time with their pracmatic trade-off between the need to stop a trial early for inefficacy if response rates were low and the likely overshoot of interim analysis in small trials.” Roger A’Hern (2014) Webb1 juli 2024 · The trial uses a Simon's minimax two-stage design. We hypothesized that excluding a CBR ≤5% while targeting an improvement of the CBR to ≥20% would be an …
WebbSimon两阶段设计常用于肿瘤药物单臂两阶段试验,具有节省样本量,早期发现试验无效及时终止试验,避免受试者接受无效治疗,节省时间和成本,更加符合伦理要求的特点。 … Webb17 jan. 2012 · Downloadable! The Simon two stage design is a single arm study with an interim analysis. The main purpose of this design is to investigate whether an …
Webb1 juli 2024 · Compared with the Gehan two-stage design, the Simon two-stage design has the advantage of being able to determine an early termination of trials when no or low anti-tumor activities are evident. Conclusion Simon two-stage design is better than single-stage design and Gehan two-stage design.
WebbT1 - Simon’s minimax and optimal and Jung’s admissible two-stage design with or without curtailment. AU - Kunz, Cornelia. AU - Kieser, Meinhard. PY - 2011. Y1 - 2011. N2 - This … dick\\u0027s sporting goods bowling shoesWebb28 juli 2024 · Since Rich Simon proposed optimal design and minimax design for two-stage phase II trials in 1986, either of them has been chosen for most of phase II clinical … city breaks from belfast march 2022Webbis observed in stage 1, but the DC rate is promising (be-cause many patients had stable disease), we do not want to stop for futility at the interim. Consider the following two … dick\u0027s sporting goods boxingWebb27 mars 2024 · Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials - PubMed. The primary objective of a phase II clinical trial of a new drug or regimen is to determine whether it … city breaks from belfast to romeWebbSimon’s like design with relaxed futility stopping Two-stage design for ordinal outcomes The Rapid Enrollment Design (RED) for Phase I trials Other programs Simon's Two-Stage … dick\\u0027s sporting goods boxingWebbCompared with the Gehan two-stage design, the Simon two-stage design has the advantage of being able to determine an early termination of trials when no or low anti-tumor activities are evident. Conclusion Simon two-stage design is better than single-stage design and Gehan two-stage design. dick\\u0027s sporting goods boxing bagWebbAbstract. This article describes a new Stata command called simontwostage, which calculates the critical values and sample sizes for two-stage designs for phase II oncology trials.Options are provided to determine the minimax and optimal designs proposed by Simon (1989, Controlled Clinical Trials 10: 1–10) and admissible designs described by … dick\u0027s sporting goods boxing bag